DEMOCRATS CLAIM TERRORISTS AREN’T MUSLIMS
Every time terrorists commit some atrocity, Obama and
Clinton rush to the mike and loudly proclaim that the terrorist activity has
nothing to do with Islam. The Paris
attack is typical. Every day since 129
people were slaughtered in Paris, Obama and Clinton have been telling the world
that it doesn’t have to do with Islam.
After all, Islam is a religion of peace, right?
As soon as you hear that comment, be assured the speaker doesn’t know what they are talking about. Also, be assured they are not qualified to lead anybody. They will never be capable of leading us to deal effectively with the terrorist issue. Here is why:
-Islam does not mean peace. It means submission under duress.
-Islam is not primarily a religion. It is primarily an ideology for a
totalitarian governmental system bent on world domination.
-The terrorist groups like ISIS are all anchored in the
authoritative literature of Islam…the Quran, the Hadith, and Sharia Law. They study it and are devoted to the
directives it contains. They study the
life of Muhammad and Islamic history.
They are especially devoted to Islamic eschatology. It drives their every move. They are married to it. They believe they are bringing it to completion. No muslims are more devoted to Islamic
ideology than Islamic Jihadists. So, to
argue that they are not “real muslims” is a futile and dangerous argument.
-We cannot deal successfully with Islamic Jihadists unless
we understand them, their ideology, and their history. For example, they follow Muhammad’s strategy
of negotiation. If we don’t realize that
strategy, we will never be successful in making an agreement with muslims. Look at the deal we made with Iran. Iran followed the strategy perfectly and we
lost on every issue because we refused to study Islamic history. Somebody in the State Department needs to
study Muhammad’s strategy of “hudna”.
-Our leaders and media “experts” always seem to be caught
off guard by the jihadist brutal tactics. That’s because they haven’t read Islamic
history. Their tactics are repeats of
previous centuries. The tactics are
straight out of the practices of their founder and subsequent leaders. There is nothing new.
